Foxcatcher

Audience Reviews

View More

Grant H. @dj530 6d When lifestyles of the rich and famous cross paths with obsessions in categories they know very little about, we see an enraged and eccentric billionaire kill an American hero. Based on the true story of John du Pont and the Schultz brothers, this heavily nominated insert of well written, directed, and acted by some of the best in the business. See more Rich L. @Richard810 Jan 29 Such a sad movie Channing Tatum doesn’t get enough credit for his performance and of course Steve Carell is amazing See more Sahil K @Sahilk171 Jan 27 I don't understand the reason for a whole 2 hr+ movie on this, this could have been maybe an hour shorter than it is, too streached out and you just lose the connection that the first 30 minutes built with you, it's a downhill towards the end and by the time it comes you just don't feel much about the movie, yes the ending was good but the movie was streached out to the brim, 5/10 See more David L @davidonfilm Dec 1 "Foxcatcher" is an emerging and haunting exploration of ambition, power, and the dark undercurrents of the American Dream. Directed by Bennett Miller, the movie masterfully intertwines the personal and the political, resulting in a narrative that is as unsettling as it is profound. Its meticulous attention to psychological detail, coupled with its unflinching portrayal of real-life tragedy, makes it a standout in modern cinema, earning its place among the greatest films of our time. From the outset, the film immerses the audience in a world of isolation and quiet desperation. The film tells the true story of Olympic wrestlers Mark (Channing Tatum) and Dave Schultz (Mark Ruffalo) and their complex relationship with wealthy benefactor John du Pont (Steve Carell). As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that Foxcatcher is not just about wrestling or sports, but also about the toxic allure of power and the lengths to which individuals will go to achieve greatness—or at least the illusion of it. The film’s pacing is deliberately slow and methodical, mirroring the psychological unraveling of its characters and drawing viewers into a tense and almost claustrophobic experience. The film’s triumph lies in its character studies, which are brought to life through remarkable performances. Steve Carell’s transformation into John du Pont is nothing short of extraordinary. Known primarily for his comedic roles, Carell delivers a chilling portrayal of du Pont, embodying his delusions of grandeur and deep-seated insecurities. His performance is a masterclass in restraint, with every gesture and glance hinting at the turmoil beneath the surface. Mark Ruffalo and Channing Tatum, as Dave and Mark Schultz respectively, offer equally compelling performances, bringing depth and vulnerability to their roles. Ruffalo’s quiet strength contrasts with Tatum’s brooding intensity, creating a dynamic that is both compelling and tragic. The craft is also a visual triumph. Cinematographer Greig Fraser captures the bleakness of the du Pont estate and the sterile, oppressive atmosphere that pervades the film. The muted color palette and sparse landscapes reflect the emotional barrenness of the characters, enhancing the film’s underlying sense of dread. Each shot is meticulously composed, with the camera often lingering on faces and spaces, forcing the audience to confront the discomfort and tension that permeates the narrative. The film delves into the dark side of the American Dream, challenging the notion that success and wealth are inherently noble pursuits. Du Pont’s obsession with greatness, coupled with his belief that money can buy respect and legacy, serves as a stark critique of a society that equates material success with personal worth. The film’s exploration of identity, power, and control is both timely and timeless, resonating with audiences who have witnessed the destructive consequences of unchecked ambition. Moreover, Bennett Miller’s direction ensures that the movie remains a deeply human story, despite its broader sociopolitical implications. Miller resists the temptation to sensationalize the events, instead opting for a more nuanced and contemplative approach. This allows the film to maintain its emotional impact, as it slowly builds toward its inevitable, tragic conclusion. The tension that simmers throughout the film culminates in a final act that is both shocking and devastating, leaving a lasting impression on the viewer. "Foxcatcher" is a film that demands to be seen not only for its gripping narrative and outstanding performances but also for its profound commentary on the human condition. In an era where cinema is often dominated by spectacle and superficiality, the movie stands as a reminder of the power of storytelling and the importance of examining the darker aspects of our collective psyche. This movie is truly something special, not just for its technical and artistic achievements, but for its unflinching exploration of the complex, often troubling nature of ambition and power. "Foxcatcher" is a stark, unsettling mirror held up to the American Dream. Through its masterful direction, stunning performances, and profound themes, it not only captivates but also challenges the viewer to consider the costs of obsession and the true meaning of success. As a cinematic achievement, Foxcatcher is a modern masterpiece, Its haunting portrayal of ambition and power leaves a lasting impact, challenging us to reflect on the darker aspects of the human condition long after the credits roll. See more Ava S @avawatches Nov 18 It’s clear Foxcatcher was shaped around its sensational true-life ending, as the rest plays out like a fairly standard sports drama. See more Gareth v @geewah Aug 8 A chilling, slow-burn true-crime drama driven by unsettling performances. The film moves at a deliberate, almost suffocating pace, allowing the tension to creep under your skin. See more Read all reviews

Foxcatcher

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING